Custom Web Development
Web applications and the backend systems underneath them architecture, APIs, authentication, data models built on foundations a team can still maintain in three years.
We design and build web and mobile products for companies that need them to work, under load, over years, and long after we hand them over.
We keep a narrow focus on purpose. Depth in a few areas produces better systems than shallow coverage of many and our depth is in the parts most agencies treat as plumbing.
Web applications and the backend systems underneath them architecture, APIs, authentication, data models built on foundations a team can still maintain in three years.
Applications for iOS and Android that feel native, degrade gracefully on poor connections, and ship to both stores from a single codebase.
Modernising the systems a business has outgrown incrementally, and without asking the business to stop while it happens.
A short list rather than a long one. Both are inspectable open the live site or read the source.
A restaurant site for a Ghanaian-Italian fusion kitchen, with a full online menu and cart, a build-your-own-bowl custom order flow, and reservation booking with date, time and guest selection. Its centrepiece is a built-in AI concierge that can carry out any task on the platform on a visitor's behalf.
These outcomes come from the professional engineering roles behind this studio production systems with real users, not demos. They are the reason we can commit to the standards above.
The same sequence on every engagement. You always know which stage you are in, what is being decided, and what you will see next.
We start with the problem, not the feature list. What the business actually needs, who uses it, what breaks today, and what success looks like in numbers. You leave this stage with a written scope and a fixed quote.
Before any product code, we agree the data model, the system boundaries, the integrations and the deployment target. Decisions made here are the expensive ones to reverse later, so we make them deliberately and write them down.
Two-week cycles, each ending in working software you can open and use not a status report. You see progress continuously on a staging environment, and priorities can shift between cycles without derailing the plan.
Performance budgets, accessibility audit, security review, load testing and cross-device verification. This is a distinct stage with its own time allocated, because quality added at the end is quality that never gets added.
You receive the repository, the architecture documentation, the environment setup guide and an operations runbook, plus a walkthrough with whoever will maintain it. Everything runs in your accounts, under your control.
We care about how systems work, why they work, and whether they should.
Most engineering decisions are invisible to the person paying for them, and most project failures trace back to one that was made carelessly. These are the five we hold to.
A clever solution nobody else can read is a liability wearing the costume of an asset. We optimise for the engineer who inherits the code which is often not us.
The most expensive code is the code that should never have been written. We push back on a requirement before building it, not after. Expect us to ask why.
Idea, architecture, implementation, iteration. Handing a design to someone else to build or a build to someone else to run is where most of the cost and most of the defects come from. We stay with it end to end.
Systems are designed for real users, bad networks and future maintainers not for the demo. Software that only works under ideal conditions has not been finished, it has been started.
There are no free architectural choices, only trade-offs with different bills attached. We name them out loud so the call is yours to make with us, not a surprise you discover later.
These are not upsells or premium tier extras. They are the baseline definition of finished work, applied to every engagement.
We work with technologies that have real communities, long support horizons, and enough people who know them that you are never dependent on us to keep going.
We quote per project, not per hour. After a discovery conversation you receive a written scope with a fixed figure and a fixed timeline attached to it, so the number you approve is the number you pay. Hourly billing transfers the risk of our estimating mistakes onto you, and we would rather carry that ourselves.
It depends entirely on scope, and any studio that answers this before understanding your requirements is guessing. What we can commit to is that you get a specific date in writing before you commit any money, and that you see working software every two weeks rather than waiting until the end to find out where things stand.
Completely. The repository is yours from the first commit, hosted in your organisation. The cloud infrastructure runs in your accounts under your billing. There is no proprietary framework, no ongoing license, and nothing that stops you moving to another team tomorrow. Lock-in is a business model we have chosen not to have.
Yes, and it is often the better arrangement. We can take a defined workstream, embed alongside your engineers, or come in specifically for architecture and code review. We work to your conventions and your review process rather than importing ours.
We work remotely and asynchronously by default, with scheduled calls at the points where they add something a written update cannot. You get direct contact with the engineers on your project not an account manager relaying messages plus a shared board showing exactly what is in progress.
Every project includes a warranty period where defects are fixed at no cost. Beyond that, we offer ongoing support and development on a monthly basis, but it is genuinely optional the handover documentation exists so your own team can take over, and some clients do exactly that.
A short message is enough to start. We reply to every enquiry, and if the project is not a fit for us we will say so directly and point you somewhere better.
Or reach us directly